Trial procedure

LEARN MORE ABOUT : Trial procedure


IENG Sary’s response to co-prosecutors’ rule 92 submission regarding civil party testimony

Date: 4 March 2013

IENG Sary’s Appeal Against the Trial Chamber’s Oral Decision to Deny His Right to Be Present in the Courtroom and to Prohibit Him From Being Video Recorded in the Holding Cell

Date: 18 December 2012

Letter from the IENG Sary Defence to the Trial Chamber Senior Legal Officer: Request for guidelines re filings related to witness statement requests and objections

Date: 19 November 2012

Email from the IENG Sary Defence to the Trial Chamber Senior Legal Officer: Request for leave to reply

Date: 13 September 2012

Letter to Trial Chamber Senior Legal Officer concerning issues to be raised at the upcoming trial management meeting

Date: 10 August 2012

Email from the IENG Sary Defence to the Trial Chamber Legal Officer: Request for leave to reply to Document E -171/1

Date: 2 March 2012

Email from the IENG Sary Defence to the Trial Chamber Senior Legal Officer: Proposal concerning the procedure of presenting key documents

Date: 20 February 2012

IENG Sary’s Reply to the Co-Prosecutors’s Response to IENG Sary’s Motion for the Trial Chamber to Conduct the Trial in Case 002 by Following a Proposed Revised Procedure and Request for an Expedited Stay on the Order to File Materials in Preparation for Trial

Date: 8 February 2012

IENG Sary’s Response to the Co-Prosecutors’ Motion Which Accompanied Their Rule 80 Expert, Witness and Civil Party Lists

Date: 8 February 2012

IENG Sary’s Request for the Trial Chamber to Direct the Trial Chamber Senior Legal Officer to Maintain Open and Transparent Communication With All Parties Concerning Trial Management Issues

Date: 13 December 2011