Trial Procedure

Sorted By:
 16 Results

IENG Sary’s Reply to the Co-Prosecutors’s Response to IENG Sary’s Motion for the Trial Chamber to Conduct the Trial in Case 002 by Following a Proposed Revised Procedure and Request for an Expedited Stay on the Order to File Materials in Preparation for Trial

Date: 8 February 2012

IENG Sary’s Response to the Co-Prosecutors’ Motion Which Accompanied Their Rule 80 Expert, Witness and Civil Party Lists

Date: 8 February 2012

IENG Sary’s Reply to Co-Prosecutor’s Response to IENG Sary’s Appeal against the Trial Chamber’s Decision Refusing his Request for the Trial Chamber to Direct its Senior Legal Officer to Maintain Open and Transparent Communication with All the Parties

Date: 7 February 2012

IENG Sary’s Appeal against the Trial Chamber’s Decision Refusing his Request for the Trial Chamber to Direct its Senior Legal Officer to Maintain Open and Transparent Communication with All the Parties

Date: 20 January 2012

IENG Sary’s Request for the Trial Chamber to Direct the Trial Chamber Senior Legal Officer to Maintain Open and Transparent Communication With All Parties Concerning Trial Management Issues

Date: 13 December 2011

IENG Sary’s Request for Immediate Resolution of and Reasoned Decisions on Outstanding Issues Prior to the Commencement of Trial

Date: 16 November 2011

IENG Sary’s Response to the Co-Prosecutors’ Additional Request for a Direction Regarding the Intentions of the Accused with Respect to Testifying

Date: 22 September 2011

IENG Sary’s Response to Co-Prosecutors’ Request for Directions on the Filing of Replies to Replies

Date: 6 September 2011

IENG Sary’s Request for an Expedited Decision as to Whether the OCP May Raise Requests for Re-Characterization at this Stage and Request for Extension of Time to Respond to Such Requests

Date: 24 June 2011

IENG Sary’s request for leave to reply and reply to the Co-Prosecutors’ response to “IENG Sary’s motion to add the OCIJ’s CASEMAP to the case file”

Date: 23 June 2011